Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bayse v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robbin Amanda Bayse and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Jauel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver v. CoreCivic et al
as 5:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Windell Weaver
Defendant:
CoreCivic, William Danforth, Ricky Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Alvin Stanley
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Damon Hininger, Warden Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Danforth et al
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gamar Stanley
Defendant:
Warden Danforth, Warden Ricky Stone, Chief Malcom Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAYSE v. WARD et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN AMANDA BAYSE and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Dr. Sharon Lewis, JAVEL JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Upton, Sr. et al
as 5:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Lorraine Franklin, Ms. Jordan, Steven Helms and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jahon Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maher v. Adams et al
as 6:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Brian Adams, CERT Sgt. Freddie Davis, Sgt. Michael Mendez and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Trouble Maher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00073
Defendant:
Warden Jack Koon, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Lisa Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward, Jack Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
