Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Middleton v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Chatham County, Chief of Police of Savannah Police Department, Nickolas Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Sanchez-Leyva v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Gerardo Antonio Sanchez-Leyva
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone and Warden, FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez Veliz v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00067
Petitioner:
Jose Sebastian Sanchez Veliz
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rhodes v. McCloud et al
as 3:2019cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cedric Sanchez Rhodes, Ced and Ced Rhodes
Defendant:
Rodney McCloud, FNU Adamkiewicz and FNU Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhodes v. McCloud et al
as 3:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Rodney McCloud, Sergeant Watts, Counselor Whitt and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Sanchez Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mata v. Stone
as 3:2017cv00042
Petitioner:
Marcelino Sanchez Mata
Respondent:
Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fuentes-Sanchez v. Laughlin
as 3:2017cv00036
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Fuentes-Sanchez
Respondent:
Vance Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Sanchez-Rivera v. Stone
as 3:2014cv00020
Petitioner:
Carlos Sanchez-Rivera
Respondent:
Stacy N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez v. Smith State Prison
as 6:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Adalberto Sanchez
Defendant:
Smith State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morales et al
as 3:2009cv00040
Petitioner:
Jose Ernesto Perez Morales, Ramon Santana, Eggy Rocha and others
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Corrections Corp. of America, McRae Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
