Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Jones v. Bussy et al
as 3:2013cv00013
Respondent:
Bussy, FNU White and Samuel S. Olens
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 3:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Bussy and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Augusta State Medical Prison et al
as 3:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
Anthony Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Augusta State Medical Prison, Cert Team Sergeant, FNU King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Blount et al
as 5:2012cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Jones
Defendant:
Clarence D. Blount, Sr., Samuel S. Olens and David A. Zisook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Morales et al
as 3:2012cv00097
Petitioner:
Torron Jones
Respondent:
Jose Morales and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nowill v. Barrow et al
as 1:2012cv00154
Petitioner:
Randall William Nowill
Respondent:
Donald Barrow and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00068
Petitioner:
Donnie L. Wright, Jr.
Respondent:
Stanley Williams and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrell v. Owens et al
as 5:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Terrell
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Samuel S. Olens, Lt. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Birt v. Danforth et al
as 1:2012cv00048
Petitioner:
Demetrius Antwan Birt
Respondent:
William Danforth and Samuel S. Olens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terrell v. Owens et al
as 1:2012cv00034
Plaintiff:
Willie Terrell
Defendant:
Brian Owens, GDC, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
