Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Curry & Company Georgia, LLC v. Cutler et al
as 6:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Curry & Company Georgia, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Cutler, Michael Cutler Company and Michael Cutler of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Priester v. Ware County Jail et al
as 5:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Priester
Defendant:
Ware County Jail, Ralph Pittman, Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Vickers et al
as 5:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Simmons
Defendant:
Wesley Vickers, Jerry Pope, Daniel Paulk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Eaves et al
as 5:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Williams
Defendant:
Martin H. Eaves, Richard E. Currie, Melba H. Fiveash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Currie et al
as 5:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Franklin L. Williams
Defendant:
Richard E. Currie, Doug Gilbson, Michael P. Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony Euree Curry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jacobs v Adelman, et al.
as 5:2008cv00019
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
David Adelman, Michael Boggs, Richard E. Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gross v. Jackson et al
as 5:2007cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robert Nathaniel Gross
Defendant:
Stephen L. Jackson, Richard Currie and Clayton Culp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
