Cases 71 - 80 of 142
MORRIS v. MORALES et al
as 3:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
ISAAC MORRIS
Defendant:
Jose Morales and Caleb Ajibade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verizon Wireless of the East, L.P. v. Columbia County, Georgia et al
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
Verizon Wireless of the East, L.P.
Defendant:
Columbia County, Georgia , Columbia County Board of Commissioners , Ron C. Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 47.U.S.C. 332(c)(7) Federal Communications Act of 1996
Morris v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
as 1:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Morris
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bosworth v. Hooks et al
as 3:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Rick Martin Bosworth
Defendant:
Brad Hooks, Timothy Jones, Ajibade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARINGTON vs. JOHNSON STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Morris Jerome Clarington
Defendant:
Johnson State Prison, DeAnn Morris and Gail Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARINGTON v. LUMPKIN et al
as 3:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris Jerome Clarington
Defendant:
Patricia Lumpkin, BRAGGS, PAULA DUNKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Toomer
as 4:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Calvin Morris
Defendant:
Christina Abbott Toomer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Morris Visitor Publications, Inc. v. Davis
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Morris Visitor Publications, Inc.
Defendant:
Merrie L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steenwerth v. Camden County, Georgia et al
as 2:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Theodore Steenwerth
Defendant:
Camden County, Georgia, Kenneth Martin Worthy, Stephen V. Kinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassady v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., et al
as 3:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
David Dwayne Cassady
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Phillip Morris Inc. and American Tobacco Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
