Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Aguilar-Roblero et al v. Carrillo-Najarro et al
as 5:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Edwin Aguilar-Roblero, Jose Cruz-Hernandez, Marcos Flores-Reyes and others
Defendant:
Nery Rene Carrillo-Najarro, Asociacion Campesina De Desarrollo De Las Comunidades De Guatemala, LLC, Triple T Family Farms, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramos v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
Jose Ramos
Respondent:
Warden Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Jack Koon, Steve Upon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Ward et al
as 6:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Ms. [FNU] Mosely, Dr. Sharon Lewis, Mr. [FNU] Whitfield and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDD v. JOHN DOE, et al.
as 6:2019cv00016
Defendant:
DICK, Deputy Jane Doe, RAMOS and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Bateman et al
as 6:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Eddie Frank Floyd, III
Defendant:
Jakelia Bateman, Mrs. Brown, Mario Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Lynette Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ramos v. Hastings et al
as 2:2013cv00095
Petitioner:
Julio Ramos
Respondent:
Suzanne Hastings and Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramos v. Haynes
as 2:2012cv00044
Petitioner:
Julio Ramos
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanchez-Cobarrubias et al v. Bland et al
as 6:2009cv00005
Plaintiff:
Bonifacio Sanchez-Cobarrubias and Pablo Ramos-Barrientos
Defendant:
Delbert C. Bland, Bland Farms, LLC and Delbert C. Bland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
