Cases 61 - 70 of 684
v. Karberg
as 1:2022xc00103
Defendant:
Kristofer Karberg and Kris Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albright v. Karberg
as 3:2022cv03033
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Albright
Respondent:
Kris Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albright v. Karbert
as 1:2022xc00104
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Albright
Respondent:
Kris Karbert and Kris Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Albright v. Karberg
as 1:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Charles Raymond Albright
Respondent:
Kristofer Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Tripp et al; Petitioner reply due 30 days after respondent's reply
as 2:2022cv01016
Petitioner:
Eddie Hicks
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Swanson v. Evans et al
as 6:2022cv02032
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Petitioner:
Robert Emil Swanson
Respondent:
Jerry Evans and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eagleelk v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv04040
Petitioner:
Littlehawk Eagleelk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harper v. Karberg
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ramon Demetrius Harper
Defendant:
Kristopher Karberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Iowa, State of
as 1:2022cv00050
Petitioner:
Tajh Malik Ross
Respondent:
Iowa, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pendleton v. Clarinda Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Devin Pendleton
Respondent:
Clarinda Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
