Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Gaston v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv04021
Petitioner:
Shawn Phillip Gaston
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taft et al v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2023cv04059
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr, Arthur James Triplett, Jr, Jason Lee Cook and others
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Terry Branstad, Kelly Garcia and others
Interested Party:
Robert Thole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koromah v. Reser et al
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Phillip B Koromah, Jr
Defendant:
Philip Reser and Karen Hart-Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv04034
Petitioner:
Phillip Edward White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hoffert v. Wendling et al
as 6:2020cv02092
Plaintiff:
Roger Joseph Hoffert, Jr
Defendant:
Black Hawk County, Waterloo, City of, Iowa, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huston et al v. Garcia et al
as 5:2020cv04019
Plaintiff:
Donald E Phillips, Arthur James Triplett, Jr and Paul Michael Huston
Defendant:
Barbara Denali and Kelly Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Wymore
as 6:2018cv02092
Plaintiff:
Tenacia Tion Kate Phillips
Defendant:
Robert Wymore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Turner et al
as 5:2018cv04039
Plaintiff:
Donald E Phillips and David Lynn Taft, Jr
Defendant:
Cory Turner, Dan Pingle, Adam Rapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mauderer v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Randal Mauderer
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Anamosa State Penitentiary, Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2016cv01009
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gregory Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
