Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Coombes v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Matthew Richard Coombes
Defendant:
Dollar Rent A Car, Jeff Lamb, II, City of Des Moines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Humility of Mary Homeless Shelter
as 3:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Campbell
Defendant:
Humility of Mary Homeless Shelter, Larry Doe and Staff at Humility of Mary Homeless Shelter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Doe
as 1:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Charles Evans, lll
Defendant:
Linda Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe II v. Keokuk Community School District et al
as 3:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe II
Defendant:
Keokuk Community School District, Michelle Lukuvisky and Gina Sisk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medrano Vargas v. Does 1-20, et al
as 4:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
Martin Medrano Vargas
Defendant:
Washington County, IA, Jerry Dunbar and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe I v. Foulkes et al
as 1:2013cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I
Defendant:
William Foulkes, CAM School District , Larry Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grandinetti v. City of Burlington et al
as 3:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Grandinetti
Defendant:
City of Burlington, Iowa , Des Moines County, Iowa and Police Officer Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Sisk et al
as 4:2012cv00412
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Gina Sisk and New London Community School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. New London Community School, et al
as 3:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Gina Sisk and New London Community School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wohlford Wessels v. City of Des Moines
as 4:2012cv00244
Plaintiff:
Stuart Paul Wohlford Wessels
Defendant:
City of Des Moines , John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
