Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Naillieux v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jason Naillieux and Jason Wayne Naillieux
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eich v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Lynn Allan Eich
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E. Raymond
Defendant:
United States of America and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Schmidt v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Schmidt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Swecker et al v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Gregory Swecker and Beverly Swecker
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture , Office of the Assistant Secretary of Civil Rights and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamache v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
Gregory Gamache
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Portzen Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00140
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
Portzen Construction, Inc., GNZ Properties, Inc., Sodarock Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Sandbothe v. United States of America et al
as 4:2007cv00080
Plaintiff:
John Sandbothe
Defendant:
United States of America, Social Security Administration, Michael J Astrue and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
