Cases 51 - 60 of 90
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00037
Plaintiff:
Tammy Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tammy Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Clark v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Richard D Clark
Defendant:
Anne Schmidt, Steven's Memorial Chapel, Dignity Funeral Home Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swington v. Mullen et al
as 4:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Trivansky Swington
Defendant:
Ron Mullen, Bill Stump, Sean Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Affinity Gaming, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00350
Defendant:
Affinity Gaming, LLC , HGI-Lakeside, LLC and Clarke County Developoment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Clarke County Development Corporation v. Affinity Gaming, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00351
Defendant:
Affinity Gaming, LLC and HGI-Lakeside, LLC
Plaintiff:
Clarke County Developoment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Anderson et al v. Branstad et al
as 4:2013cv00253
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson, Gerald Elton Busch, William Cubbage and others
Defendant:
Terry E Branstad, Kim Reynolds, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Conard et al
as 4:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
Dennis Conard, Unknown Glasgow, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Clark County Jail
as 4:2013cv00183
Plaintiff:
David Dean Swift
Defendant:
Clark County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
