Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Buckles v. Thompson et al
as 1:2012cv01194
Plaintiff:
Arick Buckles
Defendant:
John E. Thompson , William J. Redshaw , L. Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Meier et al
as 4:2012cv04031
Plaintiff:
Leonard L Jones
Defendant:
Tom Meier, John Doe, I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontano v. Godinez et al
as 3:2012cv03042
Plaintiff:
James Fontano
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez, Alex Dawson, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stenson v. Peoria Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv01037
Plaintiff:
Caesar Stenson
Defendant:
Peoria Police Department, John Doe and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoller v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co et al
as 4:2011cv04102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co, Robert P Kelly, Gerald L Hassell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Wilson v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2011cv03391
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wilson
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Champaign Community Unit 4 School District et al
as 2:2011cv02223
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Champaign Community Unit 4 School District, Rhonda Howard, Arthur R Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Champaign Community Unit 4 School District et al
as 3:2011cv03355
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Champaign Community Unit 4 School District , Rhonda Howard , Arthur R Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britt v. County of Peoria et al
as 1:2011cv01034
Plaintiff:
Danny L Britt
Defendant:
County of Peoria, Lee Hoffman , Bret Merna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luster v. Meredith et al
as 1:2011cv01018
Plaintiff:
Alan Luster
Defendant:
Martin Meredith, John Doe, 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
