Cases 1 - 10 of 221
French v. Mahone et al
as 1:2021cv01222
Plaintiff:
Eric French
Defendant:
Sylvie Mahone, Dr Andre Tilden, . McNabb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv02280
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Thomas M Lehman, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Handy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasho et al v. Walker et al
as 1:2007cv01298
Plaintiff:
Phillip L Abraham, Otis Arrington, Kenneth Bakalik and others
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Dr Willard Elyea, Roberta Fews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tosh v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2019cv04081
Plaintiff:
Jason Tosh
Defendant:
Mendi Pilger, Henry Hill Correctional Center, Stephanie J Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Wexford Health Sources Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01126
Defendant:
. Rice, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and . Tilden
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv01063
Defendant:
Teri Kennedy, John Baldwin, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ommen Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mister v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv03031
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, . Barra, . Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Sharvelt Mister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mister v. Nawoor et al
as 3:2019cv03033
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, . Mattricks, Kathy Gavin and others
Plaintiff:
Sharvelt Mister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Handy v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 1:2019cv01091
Defendant:
Officer Burns, Illinois Department of Corrections, Jean Campanella and others
Plaintiff:
James Handy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkins v. Dorethy et al
as 1:2019cv01085
Defendant:
. Buis, . Booner, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
