Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Smith v. Macon County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2017cv02276
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
Macon County Circuit Court, . Webber, Macon County Circuit Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Macon County States Attorneys Office et al
as 2:2017cv02271
Plaintiff:
Adam Smith
Defendant:
Macon County States Attorneys Office, Jay Scott, Macon County Investigator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carney v. Decatur Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02222
Plaintiff:
Adam G Carney
Defendant:
Decatur Police Department, City of Decatur, States Attorney Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meagher v. City of Sullivan et al
as 1:2017cv01394
Plaintiff:
David Meagher
Defendant:
City of Sullivan , James Waggoner , Jared Hayse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newman v. The City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03147
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Newman
Defendant:
The City of Quincy, Robert Copley, Kyle Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Pfister et al
as 1:2017cv01254
Defendant:
Randy Pfister , James Boland , Officer Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lovelace et al v. Gibson et al
as 1:2017cv01201
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lovelace , Logan Lovelace , Lincoln Lovelace and others
Defendant:
Adam Gibson, Robert Copley, John Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Pollard et al
as 3:2017cv03121
Plaintiff:
Allen D Adams
Defendant:
Randy Pollard, Timothy Neubauer, Chere Kay Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2016cv02321
Plaintiff:
Willie Randolph
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Adam P Monreal, Victor P Calloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
