Cases 31 - 40 of 320
Artis v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 1:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
Montez Artis
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc, Andrew Tilden, Cheryl Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coe v. Webb et al
as 2:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Coe
Defendant:
Peter Webb and Unknown Employees of IDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. McCartney et al
as 3:2022cv03276
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wright
Defendant:
Andrew McCartney and Beardstown Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cisco v. Fitton et al
as 2:2022cv02260
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cisco
Defendant:
Matthew Fitton, Andrew Killian, Ford County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stover v. Miller-Jones et al
as 2:2022cv02247
Plaintiff:
Josh Andrew Stover
Defendant:
Janie Miller-Jones and Rosenbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coe v. Story
as 2:2022cv02233
Plaintiff:
Andrew D Coe
Defendant:
. Story
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliland v. Ramos et al
as 1:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Cory Gilliland and Andrew Gilliland
Defendant:
Jason Ramos, Zachary Jackson, Dylan Lowder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilliland v. Buckner et al
as 2:2022cv02230
Plaintiff:
Cory Gilliland
Defendant:
. Buckner, Andrew Killian, Lance Cagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toms v. Securus Phone Service
as 2:2022cv02164
Plaintiff:
Andrew Toms
Defendant:
Securus Phone Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamon v. Mitchell
as 1:2022cv01212
Petitioner:
Andrew Lamon
Respondent:
David Mitchell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
