Cases 71 - 80 of 11,147
Crayton v. Turner
as 1:2024cv01205
Plaintiff:
Stefan Crayton
Defendant:
. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
House v. Adkins
as 1:2024cv01169
Petitioner:
Jumar Antione House
Respondent:
Felicia Adkins
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stanbridge v. People of the State of Illinois
as 3:2024cv03083
Petitioner:
Kevin W Stanbridge
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. Howarter
as 1:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Drew Logan
Defendant:
Justin Howarter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Brown et al
as 3:2024cv03139
Plaintiff:
Shaun M Koontz
Defendant:
Candie Brown and Stefanie Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Kotteman et al
as 3:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Shaun M Koontz
Defendant:
Steven Kotteman and Stefanie Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2024cv04099
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Elizabeth Schmidt, . Jumper, . Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Ackman et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
J Ackman, . Watercotte, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schargorodsky v. Ek et al
as 2:2024cv02090
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schargorodsky
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Jennifer Chacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
