Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Gorbey v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Michael Gorbey
Defendant:
Scott . Harris, Clayton R Higgins, Jr, United States Supreme Court Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Barnes v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv01068
Plaintiff:
Lorne Barnes
Defendant:
Brittany Miller, . Baillez, . Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackel v. Hou et al
as 4:2020cv04013
Defendant:
Grace B Hou, Heather Hymes, . Moody and others
Plaintiff:
David L Mackel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kallis et al
as 1:2019cv01005
Defendant:
All unnamed parties, Saul Kallis and Nannette Barnes
Plaintiff:
Charlise Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckel et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04247
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel and Allen M Barnard
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Erik Kunkle, C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04207
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
James Dimas , Gregg Scott , Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carpenter v. Pennock et al
as 4:2017cv04208
Plaintiff:
Jermaine D Carpenter
Defendant:
Wanda Pennock, Paula Lodge, Lisa Logden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04173
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
