Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherman v. Raoul
as 3:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sherman
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Swopes v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Sherman Swopes
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv03242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willis v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2017cv03100
Plaintiff:
Sherman M Willis
Defendant:
Mary Shaffer, Steve Nichols, . Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Power et al
as 1:2014cv01472
Plaintiff:
Shawn Love
Defendant:
Jon Power, Julie Bickle, Brenda Sigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. McCoy et al
as 1:2014cv01185
Plaintiff:
Sherman . Davis
Defendant:
Michael D McCoy, Joseph M Needham, Brian L Asbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
