Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Jackson v. Schluter et al
as 2:2016cv02225
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jackson
Defendant:
Bradley J Schluter, . Flannery, John Petersen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt v. Petersen Health Care et al
as 3:2015cv03242
Plaintiff:
Harriet Belt
Defendant:
Petersen Health Care and Petersen Health Care - Farmer City, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miner v. Petersen Health Care Inc
as 2:2013cv02035
Plaintiff:
Linda Miner
Defendant:
Petersen Health Care Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Petersen Health Care II, Inc. v. BEACON OF HOPE HOSPICE, INC.
as 1:2010cv01362
Plaintiff:
Petersen Health Care II, Inc.
Defendant:
BEACON OF HOPE HOSPICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whirl v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv02239
Plaintiff:
Kemo Delshun Whirl
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael P Randle, James Sledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whirl v. Randle et al
as 2:2010cv02222
Plaintiff:
Kemo Delshun Whirl
Defendant:
Michael P Randle, Jackie Miller, Keith Anglin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solis v. Petersen Health Care Inc et al
as 2:2009cv02116
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis
Defendant:
Petersen Health Care Inc, Petersen Health Care II Inc and Petersen Health Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rockman v. Leibach et al
as 2:2009cv02029
Plaintiff:
Clayton Rockman
Defendant:
Blair Leibach, John Chambers, John Loftus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
