Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
White v. Dorthy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01304
Plaintiff: Randall S White
Defendant: Stephany Dorthy, . Hanna, . Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L'Heureux v. IKO Manufacturing Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02067
Plaintiff: Dee L'Heureux
Defendant: IKO Manufacturing Inc, IKO Industries Inc, IKO Industries Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dees v. Smith et al
as 3:2013mc00028
Plaintiff: Rodney Dees
Defendant: Angela Smith , James Daniel Sisk and Patrick Ferguson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02062
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Childrous v. Eden et al
as 1:2012cv01474
Plaintiff: Dee Arlise Childrous
Defendant: Eden, . Baylor and Matern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgin v. Edgar County of Illinois et al
as 2:2012cv02274
Plaintiff: Dee Burgin
Defendant: Edgar County of Illinois and Edward Motley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hershey v. Schnuck Markets Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03278
Plaintiff: Dee Hershey
Defendant: Schnuck Markets Inc. and Stanley Access Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01264
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Powells v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv04070
Petitioner: Johnny Dee Powells
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cianfaglione v. Rogers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02170
Plaintiff: Angelina Cianfaglione
Defendant: Terry Rogers, Dee Burgin, Robert Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?