Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Grant v. US Department of Justice
as 3:2017cv03274
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Kabaker et al
as 3:2017cv03261
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Richard Abel Kabaker , State of Illinois and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Grant v. Kabaker et al
as 3:2017cv03257
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Richard Abel Kabaker, State of Illinois and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. United States Department of Justice
as 3:2017cv03188
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stewart v. Stewart et al
as 2:2017cv02101
Plaintiff:
Dylan Stewart
Defendant:
Lorenzo Shane Stewart, Hoke Electrical Company Inc, Edward Enyart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Grant v. Kabaker et al
as 3:2016cv03245
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Richard Abel Kabaker , State of Illinois and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grant v. Kabaker et al
as 3:2016cv03239
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Defendant:
Richard Abel Kabaker, Bruce Rauner, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Turner v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2016cv03158
Plaintiff:
Lawrence D Turner
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Judicial Inquiry Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Qumbargi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv01167
Plaintiff:
Haitham Qumbargi
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reddy v. United States Department of Justice
as 3:2015mc03008
Movant:
Obul Reddy
Respondent:
United States Department of Justice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
