Cases 21 - 30 of 75
Harper v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2021cv01009
Defendant:
Kevin Keller, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mallorie Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Bednaco Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv02300
Defendant:
Jaimie Belcher, Antonio Brown, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anderson and Matthew R Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2020cv04194
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Rob Jeffreys, Robert Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2020cv04190
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, . Pumfrey and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Couch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv03150
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, SIU ENT, John Does and Jane Does Medical Dental and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turley v. McLaughlin et al
as 4:2020cv04128
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, . Stromberger, . Lippens and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory J Turley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2020cv01166
Defendant:
. O'Brien, . Ritz, Andrew Tilden and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Leslie Johnson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv03054
Plaintiff:
Estate of Leslie Johnson
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Jason P. Crisman, Clinton D. Zoller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weston v. Dehn et al
as 1:2019cv01288
Defendant:
John Doe V, J Fike, John Doe, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Weston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Melvin et al
as 1:2019cv01281
Defendant:
. Schebinner, . Evans, . Punke and others
Plaintiff:
James Earl Wright, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
