Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Lane-Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv02213
Plaintiff: Lucille Lane-Smith
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv03277
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Kerry A Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Fallon v. Pfister et al
as 1:2014cv01345
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Fallon
Defendant: . Pfister, . Hobart, . Transcoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Zook et al
as 1:2014cv01323
Plaintiff: Kendrick Butler
Defendant: . Zook, . Brubaker, . Drysdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Pfister et al
as 1:2014cv01105
Plaintiff: Kendrick Butler
Defendant: Randy Pfister, Hack Saw, Guy Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Couve et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01063
Plaintiff: Kenneth Williams
Defendant: John Couve , Matt Lane , Peoria Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. Rector et al
as 3:2013mc00025
Plaintiff: Shad Hammond
Defendant: Angel Rector , Christy Brown , . Wahl and others
Rentfro et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv02056
Plaintiff: Daniel S Rentfro , Sherwin Savage , Robert Hendricks and others
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael Puisis, Louis Schicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Griffen
as 4:2012cv04019
Plaintiff: Adam Lane
Defendant: Michael Griffen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v Tyson Foods Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02285
Plaintiff: Dale B Adams
Defendant: Tyson Foods Inc, Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?