Cases 51 - 60 of 1,269
Currey v. Wexford Health Sources Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv02233
Plaintiff:
Jacob Currey
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Incorporated, . Adkins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin-Carney v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Ademeko Maclin-Carney
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, . Renfro, Macon County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkerson v. Shawgo et al
as 4:2023cv04178
Plaintiff:
David Wilkerson
Defendant:
Zach Shawgo, Illinois Department of Human Services, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guereca v. Slegal et al
as 4:2023cv04165
Plaintiff:
Ray Guereca
Defendant:
. Slegal, Unknown Officer, . Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Murphy et al
as 3:2023cv03290
Plaintiff:
Tavaris E Hunt and Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Joshua Murphy, Jane Doe, Debbie Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plotke v. Lynn et al
as 3:2023cv03286
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Plotke
Defendant:
Kevin Lynn, Chad Eimet, Clinton Wombles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Walken et al
as 1:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Donald G Moore
Defendant:
. Walken, . Turner, . Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Doe
as 3:2023cv03285
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Morrow
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarez v. Adkins et al
as 2:2023cv02204
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarez
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Rob Jeffries and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wallace et al
as 3:2023cv03281
Plaintiff:
Dayne Woods
Defendant:
Dax Wallace, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
