Cases 81 - 90 of 94
Simmons v. Gilson et al
as 1:2008cv01288
Plaintiff:
George Ellis Simmons
Defendant:
Kevin Gilson, John Sisson, . Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2008cv02187
Plaintiff:
Benny R Shaw
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections and Champaign County States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Burton v. Brewer et al
as 1:2008cv01142
Defendant:
Alnoraindus Burton, Reginald Brewer, John Garlic and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC v. 77.620 acres more or less et al
as 3:2008cv03127
Plaintiff:
ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC, ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC and ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE LLC
Defendant:
77.620 acres more or less, Rebecca S Wilson, Marilyn E Oster and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Greenman v. Polk et al
as 3:2008cv03099
Plaintiff:
Ryan Greenman
Defendant:
Terry Polk, Jennifer Stoudt, Rich Pillow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hearn v. Shaw et al
as 1:2007cv01293
Plaintiff:
Micheal Hearn
Defendant:
Cletus . Shaw, Eddie Jones and Roger E Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Shaw
as 2:2007cv02200
Plaintiff:
John M Walker
Respondent:
Frank Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Simons v. Shaw et al
as 1:2007cv01252
Plaintiff:
Rudi Simons
Defendant:
F Shaw, Terry McCann, Roger Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simons v. Shaw et al
as 3:2007cv03258
Plaintiff:
Rudi Simons
Defendant:
F Shaw, Terry McCann, Roger Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
