Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Cobb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03195
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Cobb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Winston v. Keithley et al
as 4:2023cv04208
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Tracy Keithley, A Hoyt, S Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pritzker et al
as 4:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Racanelli v. Pritizker et al
as 4:2023cv04197
Plaintiff:
Joseph Racanelli
Defendant:
J B Pritizker, Kwame Raoul, Gregg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. WaterKotte et al
as 4:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Cody Water Uotte, Shane Jumper, Gerald Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Hefly et al
as 4:2022cv04189
Plaintiff:
Andre Winston
Defendant:
Y Hefly, S Jumper, G Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Epperson et al
as 4:2022cv04161
Plaintiff:
Otis Arrington
Defendant:
William Epperson, P. Lodge, A Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers v. Cobb et al
as 4:2022cv04160
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
A Cobb, Paula Lodge and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Jumper et al
as 4:2022cv04146
Plaintiff:
Keith Hill
Defendant:
Shan Jumper, A Cobb and A Hoyt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cobb v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv03142
Plaintiff:
Phillip D Cobb
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
