Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Boswell v. Tilden et al
as 1:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
David M Boswell, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, Patricia Rice, Sheila Mara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Wertz et al
as 1:2020cv01333
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center, Woodford County, IL States Attorney, Mason County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
David M Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Woodford County, IL Jail et al
as 1:2020cv01265
Defendant:
Graham Correctional Center, Woodford County, IL Jail and Mason County, IL Jail
Plaintiff:
David M Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sturgeon v. Austin
as 1:2020cv01211
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Glen Austin
Petitioner:
David M. Sturgeon and David M Sturgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv02329
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
David M Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Swallows v. Sullivan
as 3:2018cv03207
Undetermined:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Daniel Q Sullivan
Petitioner:
David M Swallows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Sloan et al
as 1:2018cv01236
Defendant:
Timothy Sloan, David M Erickson and Cassandra Haller
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Boswell v. Melvin et al
as 1:2018cv01159
Plaintiff:
David M Boswell, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Melvin , Jamie Horton , K. Naretto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreland v. Moreland et al
as 2:2017cv02069
Plaintiff:
Sandra E Moreland
Defendant:
Amanda R Moreland, Vala Lori Overholser and David M MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
