Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Donelson v. Mindi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv03177
Petitioner: Charles Donelson
Respondent: Mindi Nurse
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Defendant: Paul Blackwell, Leonta Jackson, William E Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Petitioner: Charles Hamilton
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and Daniel Clark
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armour v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv03240
Plaintiff: Charles W Armour
Defendant: Tracy Cheatham, Daniel Sullivan, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03259
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newton v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03240
Respondent: Illinois Department of Corrections and Kimberly Smith
Undetermined: Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner: Keith B Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hanks v. Smith et al
as 3:2018cv03132
Petitioner: Jay A Hanks
Respondent: Kimberly Smith and John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamb v. Smith
as 3:2018cv03063
Petitioner: Antoine Lamb
Respondent: Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McMillan v. Baldwin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv03049
Petitioner: Michael D. McMillan
Respondent: John Baldwin and Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ball v. Smith We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv03301
Petitioner: Mickey Ball
Respondent: Kimberly Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Gaven, et al
as 3:2017cv03271
Plaintiff: Orvid Miller
Defendant: . Gaven, Kimberly Smith and Wexford Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?