Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Swanson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01176
Petitioner:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Njus v. Warden McClean County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv01154
Petitioner:
Joel Njus
Respondent:
Warden McClean County Detention Center
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Warden FCI Thomson
as 4:2024cv04064
Petitioner:
Dennis Sullivan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Poore v. Warden RRM Kansas City
as 1:2024cv01120
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Poore
Respondent:
Warden RRM Kansas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lambert v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01100
Petitioner:
Mario Lambert
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Punke et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
. Punke, . Henry, D. Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelsrud v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelly Jo Nelsrud
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv03306
Petitioner:
Troy Woods
Respondent:
Warden Christian County Sheriff's Office and Kwame Raoul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Armando v. Warden of USP Thomson
as 4:2023cv04177
Petitioner:
Ibarra Medina Armando
Respondent:
Warden of USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Bennett
as 2:2023cv02218
Petitioner:
Nekia Turner
Respondent:
Warden Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
