Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jeong v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Aeri Jeong
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Whitener v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
NNEKA C. WHITENER
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Martha Medina-Malthes
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ahmad v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Sharjeel Ahmad
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ngo v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 1:2018cv01340
Plaintiff:
Thinh Duc Ngo
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
