Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Before Judge Matthew Kennelly
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,140
Pitts v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff: Herbert Pitts
Defendant: City Of Chicago and Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv07095
Plaintiff: Tirnell Williams
Defendant: Thomas Dart, Cook County of Illinois, Roxane Boutee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Corder v. Suppressed
as 1:2022cv06642
Plaintiff: Eric Corder
Defendant: Suppressed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nissenbaum v. Eddy
as 1:2022cv07159
Petitioner: Nathan Nissenbaum
Respondent: Melinda Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff: Anthony L Smith
Defendant: Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liggins v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv06709
Plaintiff: Elijah Liggins
Defendant: Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv07038
Plaintiff: Micah Anderson
Defendant: Greg Brown and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Perwinkle et al
as 1:2022cv06267
Plaintiff: Micah Anderson
Defendant: Toni Perwinkle, Rocha Iseral, Jr. and Cermak Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Cook County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2022cv06293
Plaintiff: Micah Anderson
Defendant: Cook County Sheriff Office, Thomas J. Dart and Toni Perwinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv06326
Plaintiff: Micah Anderson
Defendant: Thomas J Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?