Cases 11 - 20 of 215
Moore et al v. Lauer et al
as 3:2022cv50354
Plaintiff:
Stephene Moore and "PM"
Defendant:
Bradley Lauer, The City Of Rockford, Scott Dimke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04717
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moore v. Illinois Board of Election et al
as 1:2022cv03432
Plaintiff:
Gregg Moore
Defendant:
Illinois Board of Election, Ian K. Linnabary and Darien Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv01406
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County Sheriff's Merit Board, COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peters v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv04366
Plaintiff:
Tarrill Peters, Jr
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation,, Sergeant Michael Petraski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00260
Defendant:
Officer Pronek, Officer Maldonado, City of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Pharrish Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
