Cases 41 - 50 of 64
McDonough Associates, Inc. v. Grunloh et al
as 1:2012cv05035
Plaintiff:
McDonough Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Bill Grunloh and Ann L. Schneider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gottlieb v. Krozel et al
as 1:2012cv03902
Plaintiff:
George Gottlieb
Defendant:
Lainie Krozel, Richard Haymaker, Gloria Materre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Calumet City et al
as 1:2012cv00494
Plaintiff:
Orlando Wooten
Defendant:
Calumet City, George Barich, Joe Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Tynan et al
as 1:2011cv05434
Plaintiff:
Gregory King
Defendant:
Bill Tynan, Roger Anderson and City of St. Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. P.O. Palm #16255 et al
as 1:2011cv05317
Plaintiff:
Bill Torres
Defendant:
P.O. Palm #16255 , P.O. Younan #7089 , P.O. Pina #13038 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone et al v. Neal et al
as 1:2010cv07727
Plaintiff:
Jay Stone , Fredrick White , Frank Coconate and others
Defendant:
Neal LANGDON, Board of Elections for the City of Chicago, Richard Cowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Midwest Fence Corporation et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2010cv05627
Plaintiff:
Midwest Fence Corporation , Victor Mendez and Tom Weisner
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Ray LaHood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Egan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv05518
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Egan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Nicholas Harris, Bill Graywal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
