Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Griffin v. CFPB et al
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Jon Antoine Griffin and Jon Antoine Jackson
Defendant:
CFPB, OCC & Bank of America, Betty Jane Griffin and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wilson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 1:2022cv05680
Plaintiff:
Betty Wilson and Darrel Wilson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and McCalla Raymer Leibert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Harlan et al v. Scholz et al
as 1:2016cv07832
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harlan and Crawford County Republican Central Committee
Defendant:
Charles W. Scholz , Ernest L. Gowen , Betty J. Coffrin and others
Intervenor_defendant:
David Orr
Amicu:
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Chicago , Action Now Institute , CHANGE Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. City of Country Club Hills et al
as 1:2016cv04243
Defendant:
City of Country Club Hills , Country Club Hills Detective Miller and Unknown County Club Hills Police Officers
Plaintiff:
Betty Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
