Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hicks v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv50451
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dean Hicks
Defendant:
United States, Social Security, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nashaat Daoud v. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr.
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
NASHAAT DAOUD
Defendant:
GEN. KENNETH F. MCKENZIE JR., in his official capacity as Commander of the United States Central Command, LLOYD JAMES AUSTIN III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, Department of Defense, United States of America, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brasfield v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2018cv03343
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Brasfield
Defendant:
National Security Agency , Central Intelligence Agency , Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinney v. United States Department of Defense
as 1:2013cv06740
Plaintiff:
Darryl W Kinney
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kinney v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2013cv01456
Plaintiff:
Darryl W Kinney
Defendant:
Department of Justice , Department of Defense and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Kinney et al v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2011cv06069
Plaintiff:
Darryl Kinney and J.K.
Defendant:
Department of Justice , Department of Defense and State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Department of Defense
as 3:2007cv50233
Plaintiff:
Rick S Rogers
Defendant:
Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007cv01622
Plaintiff:
Patty Daniels, Patty Daniels, Patty Daniels and others
Defendant:
United States of America, United States of America, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
