Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Taylor v. Malkowski et al.
as 1:2019cv07211
Defendant:
Medical Technician Bobby, Mary Ellen Grennan, Unknown Health Care Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Podkulski v. Kaminsky et al
as 1:2018cv07872
Defendant:
Officer John Doe and Officer Kaminsky
Plaintiff:
Steven Podkulski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. City of Blue Island Police et al
as 1:2018cv07343
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, City of Blue Island Police, Sergeant Sisk and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lumpkins v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv08592
Plaintiff:
Robert Lumpkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Officer John Doe and Offier Sgt John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christmas v. Officer John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2017cv08554
Plaintiff:
Wendell Earl Christmas
Defendant:
Officer John Doe #1, Officer John Doe #2, Officer John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Calumet City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv08565
Plaintiff:
Cordell Thurman
Defendant:
Jose Rivas and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Winnebago County Justice Center et al
as 3:2017cv50326
Plaintiff:
Shardon Ahpree Gay
Defendant:
Winnebago County Justice Center, Shawbecker and Unknown Name Officer/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Quarles et al
as 1:2017cv06094
Plaintiff:
John E. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
D. Quarles, Officer Ross, C Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Dixon Correctional Center et al
as 3:2017cv50049
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Boykin
Defendant:
John Varga, Officer(John Doe) and Crisis Watch Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paschal v. Anderson et al
as 1:2016cv07071
Plaintiff:
William Paschal
Defendant:
Officer Anderson, Officer John Doe, Sergeant Doody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
