Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lewis v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv05353
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis
Defendant:
Sheriff John D. Idleburg, Chief Clouse, Deputy Chief Kalfas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maki, Jr. v. Crockett et al
as 1:2021cv01886
Defendant:
Sheriff John D. Idleburg, Dominic Marchiafava, Deputy Chief Charles Crockett and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde A. Maki, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Sergeant Thomas et al
as 1:2020cv04465
Defendant:
Sergeant Thomas, Officer Abu and Officer Mrokin
Plaintiff:
Clyde Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Chaplain of Stateville Correctional Center Mr. Adamson et al
as 1:2018cv06103
Defendant:
Chaplaint of Stateville Correctional Center Mr. Adamson and Chaplain of Stateveille Correctional Center Mr. Adamson
Plaintiff:
Clyde Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dart et al
as 1:2014cv05878
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clyde Smith
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Toni Preckwinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cook County Department of Correction
as 1:2014cv04149
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson-Bey v. Ruffolo et al
as 3:2013cv50319
Plaintiff:
William Anderson-Bey
Defendant:
Anthony James Ruffolo, Clyde McGhee, Ruffolo Builders Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Clydes Delicious Donuts et al
as 1:2013cv05744
Plaintiff:
Craig Armstrong
Defendant:
Clydes Delicious Donuts, Chief Executive Officer, Isidor Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foote v. Meyers et al
as 3:2011cv50321
Plaintiff:
Darrion Omalley Foote
Defendant:
Richard A. Meyers, Andrea Tack, Val and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv00915
Plaintiff:
Clyde Hawk
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Iverliz L. Mathews, M. Vacky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
