Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McBroom v. TransUnion Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv04151
Plaintiff:
Benjamin McBroom
Defendant:
TransUnion Corporation, Latoya Hughes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dale et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
James E Walker
Defendant:
D Dale, C Schultz, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naydenov v. Doe, et al
as 1:2022cv03527
Plaintiff:
Andre Naydenov
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Jr et al v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2021cv02807
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, Cermak Health Services, John/Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lorenzo Dwayne Thomas Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elkins, Jr. v. Nicklaus et al
as 3:2020cv50448
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Elkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Kester et al
as 3:2020cv50266
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elkins, Jr. v. Carlson et al
as 3:2020cv50205
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Michael Remmers, Amber Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Elkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley El v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02975
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
William D. Riley El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Balawender et al
as 1:2020cv00112
Defendant:
John Doe #4, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #5 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dean Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sibley v. Cook County et al
as 1:2018cv02085
Plaintiff:
Moirsche Sibley
Defendant:
Cook County, City Of Markham, Markham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
