Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.) et al
as 3:2023cv50402
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.), Warden Gonzalis, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Gonzalis et al
as 3:2023cv50226
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Gonzalis, Hess, GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts et al v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv11498
Plaintiff:
Herbert Pitts, Nathaniel Boyce, Coreyon Williamson and others
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Smith
as 1:2016cv06606
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Illinois Department of Corr.
as 1:2016cv06645
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Butler et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Kim Butler, Lisa Madigan and Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Harrington et al
as 1:2013cv07821
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Rick Harrington and Attorney General Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Attorney General of the State of Illinois et al
as 1:2010cv03861
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07072
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conway et al v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2006cv07073
Plaintiff:
Chad W. Conway, Matthew A. Quigley, Michael Smith and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Ramsey, Lynn Woodruff and Kim Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
