Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Projection Capital Markets, LLC v. CBOE Global Markets, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv04901
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC, Chicago Board Option Exchange, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Projection Capital Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Denson v. DOES 1-11 et al
as 3:2017cv50382
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Denson
Defendant:
DOES 1-11, Tuell, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patni et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08709
Plaintiff:
Junaid Patni , Charlene Marsh and Kimberly Crawl
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Travis Kalanick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harang et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08500
Plaintiff:
Julius J. Harang , Norbert Hennrich , Betsy Hennrich and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Travis Kalanick and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2518
Lewis v. Rauner, et al.
as 1:2017cv01488
Plaintiff:
James D. Lewis
Defendant:
Bruce Rauner, John and/or Jane Doe and John and/or Jane Doe's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Evans et al
as 1:2015cv06465
Plaintiff:
Dimitrius Thomas
Defendant:
Michael L. Evans, Scott S. Nodine, Semmister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOES
as 3:2015cv50109
James John Kennedy Mutesha v. Buffalo Grove Police Dept. et al
as 1:2013cv06078
Plaintiff:
Ronex James John Kennedy Mutesha
Defendant:
Buffalo Grove Police Dept., International Profit Associates, Oak Park Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce Compliance
Smith v. Cook County, IL et al
as 1:2012cv05036
Plaintiff:
Bruce Smith
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Aramark Food Services and John Doe or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
