Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv10338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gary R. Clemens, D.D.S. v. Gagandeep Bhatti, et al
as 1:2014cv09001
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Clemens, D.D.S.
Defendant:
Gagandeep Bhatti, John Does 1-10, Tripat K. Grewal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Koschman v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv02041
Plaintiff:
Nanci Koschman
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , Ronald Yawger, Rita O'Leary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dr. William P. Gress et al v. Liberty Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Dr. William P. Gress , Dr. William M. Pollack , Glen Ellyn Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Liberty Capital Group, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gary R. Clemens, D.D.S. v. Diversified Dental Services, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv08329
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Clemens, D.D.S.
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Diversified Dental Sales & Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv10417
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bang v. Acura Pharmaceuticals et al
as 1:2010cv05757
Plaintiff:
Chris Bang
Defendant:
Acura Pharmaceuticals, Andrew D Reddick, Peter A Clemens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rivera v. Fiala et al
as 1:2008cv03848
Plaintiff:
Miguel Rivera
Defendant:
Edward Fiala, Marjorie C. Laws, Frank Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
