Cases 21 - 30 of 89
Patni et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv08709
Plaintiff:
Junaid Patni , Charlene Marsh and Kimberly Crawl
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Travis Kalanick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nadzhafaliyev et al v. Hardy et al
as 1:2017cv04469
Plaintiff:
Ali Nadzhafaliyev, Sean Gunderson, Paul Olsson and others
Defendant:
Daniel Hardy, Coleen Delaney, Brian Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Marquez et al
as 1:2017cv03150
Plaintiff:
Zsoch Dunn
Defendant:
Eric Marquez, Daniel Padilla, Steve Joung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla et al v. Langley et al
as 1:2017cv03028
Plaintiff:
Daniel Padilla, Sean Gunderson, Paul Olsson and others
Defendant:
Joanna Langley, Brian Dawson, Jeff Pharis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Mathews et al
as 1:2017cv02864
Plaintiff:
Erick B. Coleman
Defendant:
Mathews, Padilla, McHale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
Terry Brown and Yolanda Brown
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Paul Kirner, Star No, 19311, Darren Dehaan, Star No. 14203 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Pinzine et al
as 1:2016cv11232
Plaintiff:
Merary Lopez
Defendant:
Michael Pinzine, Chicago Police Officer Laqui, David Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Ocwen N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv07913
Plaintiff:
Gloria V. Padilla
Defendant:
Ocwen N.A., Ronald M. Faris, Michael Bourque and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Ortiz Padilla v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv07531
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Nicholas Ortiz Padilla
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
United States of America v. Padilla
as 1:2016cv06626
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Felipe Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
