Cases 31 - 40 of 66
Williams v. Dickerson III et al
as 1:2015cv10753
Plaintiff:
Clyde Williams
Defendant:
George Dickerson III, Sigma Security Services, The city and/or State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newbury et al v. Abb Vie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04004
Plaintiff:
Clyde Newbury and Sheryl Newbury
Defendant:
Abb Vie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv03420
Plaintiff:
Larry Alexander , Charles Allen , Karen Allen and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holloway et al v. Actavis, Inc.
as 1:2015cv03266
Plaintiff:
Clyde Holloway and Jan Holloway
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin et al v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv02947
Plaintiff:
Clyde Griffin and Rhonda Griffin
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc and Abbott Laboratories
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv01317
Plaintiff:
Antwoine Hill and Clyde Jackson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Illinois, Roger Murphy and Thomas Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiseman v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00642
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wiseman
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heath v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10339
Plaintiff:
Clyde W Heath
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts & Schaefer Company v. Clyde Bergemann Delta Ducon, Inc.
as 1:2014cv08841
Plaintiff:
Roberts & Schaefer Company
Defendant:
Clyde Bergemann Delta Ducon, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Clyde Bergemann Delta Ducon, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Roberts & Schaefer Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Keller v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv07380
Plaintiff:
Clyde W. Keller
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories Inc., Actavis PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
