Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Johnson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv04857
Plaintiff:
ONeal Johnson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, AD Kemps and BJ Cahill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03713
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund v. Lasser et al
as 1:2009cv00119
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare Fund
Defendant:
Marshall Lasser and Daniel Kemp
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kemp v. McCann et al
as 1:2008cv06280
Petitioner:
Antoine Kemp
Respondent:
Terry McCann and Stateville Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv06502
Plaintiff:
Derron Johnson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer Malloy and Officer Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bradley v. Kemps et al
as 1:2007cv06487
Plaintiff:
Darnell Bradley and Darnell Bradley
Defendant:
A. D. Kemps, C. M. Moyer and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01796
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
