Cases 1 - 10 of 24
In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2024cv02110
Defendant:
Beijing Douyin Information Service Co. Ltd, Douyin Ltd., TikTok Inc and others
Not Yet Classified:
TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation
Plaintiff:
Anibeth Bravo, Katie Murphy, Artemis Buckley and others
United States of America v. Berrios
as 1:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert L. Berrios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Haywood v. Gondek et al
as 1:2021cv06542
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
E. Gondek, A. McGee, Y. Tefledzhuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berrios v. KOS Services, LLC
as 1:2020cv07072
Defendant:
KOS Services, LLC d/b/a Dental Dreams and Kos Services, LLC doing business as Dental Dreams
Plaintiff:
Erica Berrios
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Williams v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2020cv00759
Defendant:
County of Cook and Joseph Berrios
Plaintiff:
Damon Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.F. Moore & Associates, Inc. et al v. Pappas et al
as 1:2018cv04888
Plaintiff:
Simon Property Group (Delaware), Inc., J. Emil Anderson & Son, Inc., A.F. Moore & Associates, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Joseph Berrios, Maria Pappas and County Of Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macaluso et al v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03203
Plaintiff:
Laura Macaluso , Jorge Villarreal , Alberto Berrios and others
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc. and Midland Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hadnott v. Berrios
as 1:2017cv07320
Plaintiff:
Edward Hadnott
Defendant:
Joseph Berrios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Justice v. Reiter et al
as 1:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
John C. Justice
Defendant:
Greg Reiter, Fair Deal of Illinois, Inc., Any Other Buyers of Tax Liens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
