Cases 1 - 10 of 828
Rojas v. Debt Relief Advocates, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04776
Defendant:
Cordoba Legal Group PLLC, Law Office of Peter M. Daigle, P.C., The, Debt Relief Advocates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50223
Plaintiff:
Justn Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. Wagner
as 3:2024cv50211
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Bobbi Jo Wagner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50212
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. O'Barto
as 3:2024cv50207
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Gina O'Barto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. Emery
as 3:2024cv50210
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
Judge Katherine B. Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De La Cruz Martinez v. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv50209
Plaintiff:
Justin Juan De La Cruz Martinez
Defendant:
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv04557
Plaintiff:
Juan A. Garcia
Defendant:
Jean Bishop and Judge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Harris v. City of Naperville, Illinois et al
as 1:2024cv04196
Plaintiff:
Amara Harris
Defendant:
City of Naperville, Illinois, Juan Leon and Jonathan W Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
