Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2022cv03437
Plaintiff:
Natasha R Jones and Natasha R. Jones
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Santarelli
as 1:2021cv00711
Defendant:
Santarelli
Plaintiff:
Bobby R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv02873
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Rosa and Ana Rosa
Defendant:
Jelonnie R. Jones and Euro United LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. J R Jones Fixture Co.
as 1:2017cv04076
Plaintiff:
Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , Chicago and Northeast Illinois Regional Council of Carpenters Apprentice and Trainee Program and others
Defendant:
J R Jones Fixture Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
U.S. Freightways Logistics, Inc. v. HT Bar, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02299
Plaintiff:
U.S. Freightways Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
HT Bar, Inc. and John R Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
First American Bank v. Cardinal Resources, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv03317
Plaintiff:
First American Bank
Defendant:
Cardinal Resources, LLC , Kevin R Jones , Barbara H Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1725 Collection under Contract Guaranty
Jones v. Monreal et al
as 1:2011cv09039
Plaintiff:
Clarence R Jones
Defendant:
Adam P Monreal, Ed Bower, City of Chicago Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company v. Jones et al
as 1:2011cv04826
Plaintiff:
Stonebridge Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Angela R. Jones and Vanetta Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Pinney v. Organizations and Agents of the State's et al
as 1:2011cv04480
Plaintiff:
Johnathan T. Pinney
Defendant:
Organizations and Agents of the State's, Corporations, Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
