Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Williams v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08947
Plaintiff:
Tanya R. Williams
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spears v. Lennox et al
as 1:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Courtney James Spears
Defendant:
OFC. Lennox, R Williams, OFC. Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Kyle et al
as 1:2022cv06290
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rukiya L Kyle, Ronald Kyle, III, Rashon Kyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Williams et al v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv04124
Plaintiff:
Joshuah R Williams and Catherine Radcliffe
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. Saul
as 1:2020cv06557
Defendant:
Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Kevin R. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Banks v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv50368
Defendant:
R. Williams, Mr. Inman, Mr. Munster and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv05639
Defendant:
Thomas J Dart
Plaintiff:
Tyrone R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv02535
Defendant:
Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated, Cook Medical LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cathryn Denise Williams, Estate of and Norman R. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02021
Defendant:
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Marshall Saul
Plaintiff:
Lynida R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Haywood v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv06359
Defendant:
R. Williams, John Doe One, J. Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Haywood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
