Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Cases 151 - 160 of 9,888
Dida v. Hvarre
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff: Mohamed Abduba Dida
Defendant: Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nellem v. Menard Correctional Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00539
Plaintiff: Dartrell Nellem
Defendant: Menard Correctional Center, Anthony Wills and C/O Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv01112
Petitioner: Keith Johnson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner: William Charles Graham
Respondent: T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banana v. Brookhart
as 3:2024cv01109
Petitioner: Donald Banana
Defendant: Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Savage v. McClellan
as 3:2024cv01107
Plaintiff: James Augusta Savage
Defendant: Ronald McClellan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. Watson et al
as 3:2024cv01108
Plaintiff: James A. Savage
Defendant: Richard Watson, Tammy Grimes, Sgt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Wills We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00467
Petitioner: Edward S. Phillips
Respondent: Warden Anthony Hills and Anthony Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff: Kareem Davenport
Defendant: Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portee v. Beary et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff: Aubrey Portee
Defendant: May Beary, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?