Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Jones v. Sproul
as 3:2024cv00860
Petitioner:
Ronnie Maurice Jones
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brough v. Gallaway et al
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Maurice Brough
Defendant:
Warden Gallaway, C/O White, Lt. Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
East v. Goetten et al
as 3:2023cv01663
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dale East
Defendant:
Benjamin Goetten, Jersey County, IL State's Attorney Office, Kevin Tellor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. USA
as 3:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Maurice Timothy Dews
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Chew-Bey v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Maurice Chew-Bey
Defendant:
Jacqualyn Lashbrook, John Baldwin and Rob Jeffries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowman et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Lowman, Christopher T. Farr, Monte J Conrad, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Tammy Grime, St. Clair County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mosley v. Blackburn et al
as 3:2022cv02078
Plaintiff:
Bernard L. Mosley
Defendant:
Xavier Blackburn, Maurice Austin, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Gomez et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Maurice S. Johnson
Defendant:
David Gomez, Graves, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vick v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Delanio Maurice Vick
Defendant:
USP Marion, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Mary et al
as 3:2021cv01261
Plaintiff:
Maurice Shelton
Defendant:
Ms. Mary, Aramark and St. Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
